IridivmTrvth.com

We are told that many popular folklore creatures are works of fiction. That Bigfoot is a person in a suit or the Loch Ness Monster is a piece of driftwood. Evidence of these creatures is very bountiful, a simple change in perspective is needed to understand them. Mainstream, evolutionary biology just cannot explain every and all instances of cryptids in the wild. It can explain some, such as the coelacanth, a supposedly extinct species of fish that was the topic of many anglers’ tall tales until its official discovery in 1938. Another example is that Darwinists say that evolution takes place over eons, but some species of moth were able to change their appearance to better camouflage in polluted air during the Industrial Revolution. Who is to say that certain creatures like Mothman are not evolutionary anomalies, instead of members of a clearly defined species? Nearly every culture on Earth has some stories about dragons, sea serpents, and ape men. The Sasquatch of North America to the Yeti of Nepal are just two famous examples. Creatures such as gorillas and orangutans already exist, so other large apes are not out of the question. However, the more a cryptid strays from mainstream biology, the more interesting it is. What are the academics hiding from us? We’ve been told that dinosaurs went extinct millions of years ago, yet plenty of dinosaur-like animals have been spotted in the wild. The Loch Ness Monster bears a striking resemblance to the plesiosaurs and Loch Ness is one of the deepest lakes in all of Scotland. The Mokele Mbembe is a pygmy sauropod sighted in the deep jungles of the Congo region. The theropod dinosaurs still exist today in the form of birds. Can we really invalidate so many cultures’ folklore on the basis of modern, Western science? The dragons of ancient China and the Quetzalcoatl of the Aztecs bear a striking resemblance and even grant similar boon to their worshipers, yet are separated by hundreds of years and thousands of miles. The great wolf of certain Native American tribes is said to be the dire wolf, an extinct mammal that has been recently reconstructed from fossils in the same style as Jurassic Park. But the most insidious one has to be the Chupacabra. Originally, it was a scaly creature with beady eyes and large spines; a distinct, almost alien appearance. But more modern interpretations paint it as a cousin of the coyote and the wild dog, just with an affinity for fresh blood. Why the sudden and drastic change? I’ll always stay vigilant here at IridivmTrvth.com and will strive to bring the best information to light. Just remember that science is the method of creating, testing, and reviewing hypotheses and should always be open to criticism. Mainstream academia can, will, and has suppressed information that threatens established norms.